Skip to content
ComparisonsJuly 12, 2026

Calling providers directly vs. routing through one gateway

Call OpenAI, Anthropic, and every other provider directly and you manage a key, an SDK, and an audit trail per provider. Route the same calls through one gateway and you manage one of each — at the cost of an extra hop. Here's the honest trade-off on auth, SDKs, failover, billing, audit logs, and switching cost.

Two ways to call an LLM

There are two honest ways to reach a model API: call the provider directly with their SDK and their key, or route the request through a gateway that sits in front of many providers behind one contract. Neither is wrong — they trade off differently depending on how many providers you actually use and what you need beyond a single request-response.

Direct calls are simpler when you only ever use one provider. A gateway earns its keep once you're juggling more than one — different SDKs, different keys, different dashboards for cost and latency.

Direct vs. gateway, side by side

DimensionDirect to each providerThrough one gateway
AuthOne API key per provider, managed separatelyOne key (sk-ar-v1-…) for every provider
SDKsEach provider's own SDK and request dialectOne OpenAI-compatible endpoint (plus /messages and /responses)
FailoverYou write retry/fallback logic yourself, per SDKAutomatic failover to a healthy upstream is built into routing
BillingA separate invoice and balance per provider accountOne balance across providers — or $0-markup BYOK on keys you already pay for
Audit logScattered across each provider's own dashboard, if one existsOne per-request log — cost, latency, tokens — across every provider
Switching costRe-integrate a new SDK, auth scheme, and error handlingEdit a provider/model id string; same key, same endpoint

What you keep either way

The comparison above only holds if the gateway doesn't trade one lock-in for another. AnyRouter's contract is the standard OpenAI-compatible surface, so the client code you write is the same code you'd write calling a provider directly — just pointed at one URL instead of many:

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
  base_url="https://anyrouter.dev/api/v1",
  api_key="sk-ar-v1-...",
)
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
  model="openai/gpt-5.5",   # or anthropic/claude-opus-4-8, google/gemini-2.5-pro
  messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
One client, any of 170+ models across 28+ providers.

Nothing about that call is proprietary to AnyRouter — the same client library talks to any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, including the provider's own.

When calling direct still makes sense

If a project talks to exactly one provider and never needs failover, a per-provider audit log, or a shared balance across models, calling that provider directly is simpler — one fewer hop, one fewer account to reason about. The gateway earns its complexity back the moment a second provider, a fallback path, or a single cost view across models enters the picture.

AnyRouter data overview dashboard showing usage aggregated across providers in one view.
One audit log across every provider, instead of one per provider dashboard.

Keep calling providers directly, or route them through one key and one audit log.

Get a key free

Route your first request in 2 minutes

Start free with your own keys, or top up and pay per token. Get $4/mo in credits and free models on Go — $2/mo, or free when you donate a provider key.

Start free